MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2343240752

Anticyclones in the Irminger Sea

2014· article· en· W2343240752 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xue Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnticycloneOcean gyreEddyArgoAdvectionClimatologyBaroclinityGeologyTemperature salinity diagramsOceanographyForcing (mathematics)Barotropic fluidMesoscale meteorologyBoundary currentBathythermographAltimeterOcean currentSalinityMeteorologyGeographySubtropicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation seeks to document observations, statistics, and physical processes relating to warm, salty mesoscale anticyclonic eddies in the Irminger Sea and their impact on the properties of the region. Anticyclones are studied with a variety of platforms including a mooring, a glider, Argo floats, satellite altimetry, and a regional model. They are found to be widespread throughout the central Irminger gyre, and are similar to anticyclones documented in the neighboring Labrador Sea and Lofoten Basin. Two anticyclone formation regions are found along the boundary current, producing two size classes of anticylones. Over the period between 2002 and 2009, anticyclone transport makes an important contribution to the heat and salt budgets of the gyre upper (<460 m) layer. Along with surface fluxes, they dominate the heat and salt balance on this time scale. The eddy contribution is relatively steady over the 7-year period and presumably over longer timescales as well. Changes in the temperature and salinity in the central gyre can be explained by anomalies in surface forcing. Over yearly time scales, the eddy contribution plays a minimal role in the heat and salt budgets, and the dominant terms include surface forcing and non-eddy horizontal advection. The assumption was made that anticyclones decay in the basin interior, motivated by the observed absence of eddies in the winter, and we explore the hypothesis that winter mixing can lead to eddy decay. To study this, a 1D mixing model is used to show that the barotropic component of velocity can be weakened during a period of sustained surface heat loss, with little change in the baroclinic component. This can push the eddy toward a counter-rotating state, which has been shown by theoretical studies to be unstable for similar anticyclonic vortices, and may thus be a mechanism for eddy decay. Observations of anticyclones are compared to a 1/20 degree resolution regional model (VIKING20). The model reproduces many features of the circulation and water masses, and similar salty anticyclones as observed. However, it cannot resolve the smallest eddies that we detected, and the long-term evolution of the eddies in the model appears to be dominated by numerical diffusivity and viscosity. Therefore, the model cannot be used for studying the processes of eddy decay

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)→Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→