Discovery of Primary, Cofactor, and Novel Transcription Factor Binding Site Motifs by Recursive, Thresholded Entropy Minimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Data from ChIP-seq experiments can determine the genome-wide binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) and other regulatory proteins. In the present study, we analyzed 745 ENCODE ChIP-seq peak datasets of 189 human TFs with a novel motif discovery method that is based on recursive, thresholded entropy minimization. This method is able to distinguish correct information models from noisy motifs, quantify the strengths of individual sites based on affinity, and detect adjacent cofactor binding sites that coordinate with primary TFs. We derived homogeneous and bipartite information models for 89 sequence-specific TFs, which enabled discovery of 24 cofactor motifs for 118 TFs, and revealed 6 high-confidence novel motifs. The reliability and accuracy of these models were determined via three independent quality control criteria, including the detection of experimentally proven binding sites, comparison with previously published motifs and statistical analyses. We also predict previously unreported TF cobinding interactions, and new components of known TF complexes. Because they are based on information theory, the derived models constitute a powerful tool for detecting and predicting the effects of variants in known binding sites, and predicting previously unrecognized binding sites and target genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".