MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343367061 · doi:10.1039/9781849732970-00070

Phytoestrogens: Naturally Occurring, Hormonally Active Compounds in Our Diet

2011· book-chapter· en· W2343367061 on OpenAlexaff
Krista A. Power, Oliver Zierau, Shannon O’Dwyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytoestrogen effects and research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoestrogensIsoflavonesRed CloverCoumestrolIn vivoHormoneMedicinePharmacologyBiologyChemistryEndocrinologyBiotechnologyBotanyEstrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytoestrogens are plant-derived compounds that can induce estrogenic effects in mammals. This chapter reviews the role of phytoestrogens, in particular the isoflavones from red clover and soy, as well as the prenylated flavonoids from hops, on human health. Red clover isoflavones are used as natural “safe” alternatives to hormone replacement therapy to help reduce menopausal symptoms and associated disease, such as osteoporosis. We review the current knowledge on the biological effects of various red clover isoflavones in vitro and in vivo, as well as the results from clinical trials. Soy is also a rich source of isoflavones, which is used in many food products, of particular focus in this chapter in infant formulas. We review the current knowledge on the biological effects induced by soy isoflavones in various rodent studies, and discuss the significance of such findings for human infant consumption. This chapter also highlights a more unique class of phytoestrogen, the prenylflavonoids, reviewing the in vitro and in vivo evidence for their estrogenic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytoestrogen effects and researchFrench-language works237,207