MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2343423789

Jeunesse en mouvement : relations au monde et pratiques culturelles chez les jeunes femmes de Manawan

2015· article· fr· W2343423789 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine Labrecque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La poussée démographique et les nombreux enjeux sociaux, culturels et politiques qui entourent la jeunesse autochtone du Québec font d’elle une catégorie sociale incontournable en sciences sociales. Toutefois, il semble qu’il y ait encore beaucoup d’aspects inexplorés chez celle-ci. Dans le cadre de ma recherche, je propose de me pencher sur le vécu de la jeunesse autochtone; mieux comprendre les différentes relations au monde des jeunes femmes atikamekw de Manawan est mon principal objectif. Afin d’y arriver, je m’attarderai principalement sur les pratiques culturelles et les activités des jeunes au quotidien. Celles-ci peuvent être effectuées à travers diverses relations, dont celles entretenues avec leur famille, l’école, les savoirs traditionnels, la langue et les réseaux sociaux. Considérée davantage comme une continuité des générations antérieures plutôt que dans une position de rupture, la jeunesse autochtone sera questionnée dans cette étude en tenant compte de la dynamique et de la solidarité intergénérationnelle. Mots-clés: Autochtone, jeunesse, femme, pratique, activité, quotidien, relations au monde, famille, école, langue, savoirs traditionnels, réseau social, agencéité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender→French-language works237,207→