MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343429785 · doi:10.1177/0363199015602862

Educational Designs

2015· article· en· W2343429785 on OpenAlexafffund
Adriana S. Benzaquèn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family History · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMount Saint Vincent University
KeywordsSeriousnessElement (criminal law)Task (project management)SociologyPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLawManagementEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the education of two younger sons, Jack Clarke and Arent Furly, whose fathers were close friends of John Locke. Through detailed analysis of the surviving correspondence, it reconstructs the process by which wealthy early modern families made decisions regarding the education and careers of younger children and demonstrates the seriousness with which parents approached this task. The educational designs for Jack and Arent were part of an elaborate exchange of favors and services between friends and included travel abroad as a central element. In consultation with their friends, both fathers settled on a course that would make practical and economic sense, ensuring that the sons would be able to make a suitable living, but they also took into consideration the boys’ individual talents, desires, and tastes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2330.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family HistorySame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207