MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343559818 · doi:10.5220/0005714300370047

Re-parameterization of a Deformation Model for Non-rigid Registration

2016· article· en· W2343559818 on OpenAlexaff
Van-Toan Cao, Trung-Thien Tran, Denis Laurendeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffine transformationRigid transformationTranslation (biology)Rotation (mathematics)QuaternionDeformation (meteorology)Rotation matrixTransformation matrixPolygon meshComputer scienceUnit vectorTransformation (genetics)MathematicsGeometryAlgorithmComputer visionKinematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a method for non-rigid registration of meshes. The method aligns two surfaces of deformable objects by automatically separating the deformation into a single global transformation and other local deformations. The local deformations are found by applying the deformation model proposed by Sumner (Sumner et al., 2007) that previous methods have used to register two surfaces. However, we specify a rigid transformation for each node of the deformation graph using a rotation matrix and a translation vector. With this model, unit quaternions of rotation matrices are paramterized using an homeomorphic relation between the 4D unit sphere and the 3D projective space. Therefore, the number of unknowns is reduced by half compared to the original models based on affine transformations and the optimization process is less complex. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method by aligning the surfaces of data sets without any prior knowledge and assumptions about the deformation between the two surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207