MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343599681 · doi:10.5376/ijccr.2016.06.0011

Case Report: Primary Pulmonary Nocardiosis and Candidosis with Cutaneous Involvement in Nephrotic Syndrome Patient under Steroid Therapy

2016· article· en· W2343599681 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priyatam Khadka, Shyam Kumar Mishra, Dibya Singh Shah, Basistha Rijal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Case Reports · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicActinomycetales infections and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNephrotic syndromeDermatologyNocardiosisPrimary (astronomy)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineNocardiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nocardiosis along with Candiodiosis are an opportunistic infection which predominantly affects an immunocompromised and debilitated patient. The Host immune systems, medication with an Immunosuppressive drug and other predisposing factors have an important role in systemic dissemination of infection. Case summary: A case of 62 year old man with a history of hypertension and steroid treated nephrotic syndrome, a chief complain of shortening of breathe, restlessness, lethargy was admitted to intensive care unit. Radiological findings shows bilateral pneumonia with parapneumonic effusion and right thigh abscesses. Method: AFB staining, Gram staining, Fluorescence staining, Culture techniques, phenotypic characteristics, biochemical interpretation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern suggests and confirm the aetiological agent conferring infection. Eventually, a medication with sulfamethoxazole and cefexime results the progressive changes in patient and hence was discharged. Conclusion: The clinical symptoms and radiological findings are nonspecific and hence microbiological investigations enlighten the aetiological agent, its characteristics features and susceptibility patterns to antibiotics for diagnostic/prognostic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical Case ReportsSame topicActinomycetales infections and treatmentFrench-language works237,207