MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343664574

Refugees, Social Justice, and Reflexive Practices: A Critical Account of Social Services in African Refugee Camps, From My Journal

2010· article· en· W2343664574 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Drolet

Bibliographic record

VenueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeEthnographyPolitical scienceReflexivityGender studiesEconomic growthCriminologySociologySocial scienceLawAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This narrative provides a critical examination of the policies, programs, and practices of social services for refugees and asylum-seekers in Africa based on original field research and field experience. Ethnographic research methods based in two refugee camp sites in Malawi provided information on the host country, the role and function of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the challenges it faces. Vignettes of two case studies are provided based on the experiences of rural Mozambican refugees in Nsanje and urban refugees in Dzaleka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional)Same topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207