MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343705971 · doi:10.14288/1.0101431

The bryo-geography of southeastern Alaska

2011· article· en· W2343705971 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian A. Worley

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation presents a bryo-geographical study of the Alexander Archipelago and the adjacent mainland of southeastern Alaska. A flora containing the 572 taxa of hryophytes now known from southeastern Alaska (67.5 percent of the known Alaskan bryoflora) has been compiled from published records and 10,901 collections made by the author. These specimens were obtained from 130 sites during an accumulated field time of 40 weeks from 1966 through 1969. There are included 38 taxa new to the state and 94 which are new to southeastern Alaska. The local distribution of each taxon has been cited fully either within the text or as a distribution map. Habitat, biological, taxonomic, and distributional information are given for each entry. The most significant components of the flora are treated within 27 geographical elements. There are probably no bryophytes endemic to southeastern Alaska. Of the total bryoflora, taxa with widespread distributions comprise ca. 74 percent, northern Pacific Basin taxa constitute ca. 16.8 percent (over one half of these are western North American endemics), ca. 5.4 percent of the flora belongs to the western North American - western Eurasian disjunction, and ca. 3.8 percent of the total displays less distinct or individual distribution patterns. The regional flora is not particularly distinctive, is com posed primarily of broad endemics or plants of widespread ranges, and is a portion of the cool-temperate, oceanic geographical zone that extends from the northern Gulf of Alaska to Vancouver Island. Southeastern Alaska lies within the northern portions of the principal zone of western North American endemism. The bulk of the flora is of temperate, cool temperate, and boreal origins with exceedingly few taxa having tropical, subtrop-cial, or arctic affinities. It has been derived primarily from a widespread Arcto-Tertiary flora which has been dissected and has re-expanded with the fluctuating events of the Pleistocene. Taxa of the North Pacific Arc represent a diversity of distributional patterns which tends to favor a recent history of post-Pleistocene expansion from local rather than from trans-Pacific sources. Several taxa, primarily hepatics of hyperbeeanic habitats, display disjunct ranges wherein certain local populations are postulated to be essentially relict. Local refugia of undetermined age exist on the elevated marine terraces northward from Icy Point to the vicinity of Yakutat Bay. Mountain nunataks were not probable as important refugia during maximum glaciations, but seaward headlands of the outer islands, strandflats, and exposed portions of the continental shelf also may have served as refugia and supported diverse communities. A zone of significantly wetter climate extends along the outermost coast and adjacent to the Dixon Entrance. Over three percent of the local flora (mostly hepatics) are restricted to the zone and are diagnostic of that environment. Areas of drier climate occur within rainshadow zones of the archipelago, along the continental Boundary Ranges, and in the upper Lynn Canal complex. The last region may he especially sensitive to climatic change and an immigration route between the oceanic and continental floristic areas. Relict populations of bryophytes (primarily mosses) from Hypsithermal time persist in specialized habitats in the archipelago within the drier zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207