MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343711762 · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2016.2519413

The Use of Empirical Mode Decomposition-Based Algorithm and Inertial Measurement Units to Auto-Detect Daily Living Activities of Healthy Adults

2016· article· en· W2343711762 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceActivities of daily livingInertial measurement unitComputer visionActivity recognitionKinematicsSet (abstract data type)Motion (physics)Process (computing)SimulationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in motion analysis for clinical purpose is relatively recent. However, the use of such system in free environment remains sparse. This is in part due the lack of robust algorithms to handle large volumes of data for performance evaluation and patient diagnosis. The present work examines the ability of using Empirical Mode Decomposition and discrete-time detection of events to automatically detect and segment tasks associated with activities of daily living (ADL) using IMUs. Seven healthy older adults (73± 4 years old) performed ADL tasks in a simulated apartment during trials of different durations (3, 4, and 5-min). They wore a suit (Synertial-IGS180) comprised of 17-IMUs positioned strategically on body segments to capture full body motion. After a systematic process examining time series of each sensor, it was determined that 6-IMUs were sufficient to detect the 9 tasks at hand (such as walking, sit to stand, stand to sit, reaching to the ground to pick or to put down objects on the floor, step an obstacle and turning). The proposed method automatically identified the proper set of template waveforms associated to ADL tasks based on kinematic data acquired from the selected IMUs. The ground truth on timing of tasks was established by visual segmentation of recordings using the system's software. Despite the variation in the occurrences of the performed tasks (freely moving), the proposed algorithm exhibited high global accuracy under unscripted conditions of motion, for both Se. and Sp. of 97% (Nevents=1999), using a few features and without learning process. This work will eventually allow for the assessment of mobility performance within the segmented signals; specifically how well the person is moving in his/her environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it