A Survey of Foreign Consumers Satisfaction with Eye-wear Products in Korea According to Nationality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
목적: 한국 안경원 제품에 대한 외국인의 만족도를 조사하고자 하였다. 방법: 한국 안경원의 이용 경험이 있는 외국인 106명(미국/캐나다, 일본, 중국, 그 외 아시아 등)을 대상으로 안경원에서 판매 되는 제품, 가격, 시력교정, 시설 그리고 친절도 등을 설문 조사하였다. 결과: 한국 안경원에서 외국인은 안경(62%)과 선글라스(25%)를 주로 구입하였고, 구입 제품의 품질 만족도의 경우 그 외 아시아 국가와 중국이 미국/캐나다와 일본에 비해 높았고, 가격만족도는 일본과 미국/캐나다가 중국과 아시아 국가보다 높았다. 시력 교정과 안경원 시설 만족도는 미국/캐나다인 에게서 상대적으로 낮게 나타났고 제품 설명 등 친절도는 모든 국적 외국인에게서 대체로 낮게 나타났다. 결론: 한국 안경원에 대한 만족도는 외국인의 국적에 따라 유의하게 차이가 있는 것으로 나타나, 소비 만족도의 다양한 항목을 바탕으로 국내 거주하는 외국인의 국적별 맞춤 마케팅 전략을 세우는데 기초가 될 것으로 판단된다. Purpose: To investigate consumer satisfaction of foreigners with eye-wear products in Korea. Methods: Foreigners (n=106, United State/Canada, Japan, China, or other Asia) who have purchased the products at optical shops in Korea, were volunteered. Satisfaction factors were categorized into 6 divisions (products, price, vision correction, facilities, kindless, description). Results: The most frequently purchased products were eye-glasses (62%) and sunglasses (25%) by foreigners at Korea's optical shops. Quality satisfaction of the products was higher to Chinese and other Asians than to American, Canadian and Japanese. Price satisfaction was higher to Japanese, American, and Canadian than to Chinese and other Asians. Vision correction and facilities satisfaction were appeared relatively low from American and Canadian. Product descriptions and kindness were, in general, lower than other categories to all nationalities. Conclusions: Satisfaction about eyewear were significantly different depending on the nationality of the foreigner. Based on the various categories of the consumer satisfaction, ethnically customized marketing strategy would be possible to foreigners who stays in Korea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it