Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a social worker in an academic department of family medicine, I have been teaching behavioural sciences since the early 1990s. Back then a snapshot of an incoming group of Canadian-trained residents reflected young men and women in their early 20s to mid-20s, single or perhaps newlywed, with homes throughout Canada. I remember one of my very first seminars on death and dying elicited several personal stories of losing a beloved family pet. I was somewhat surprised that so many of these new physicians had thus far been protected from the illness or death of a family member and had to remind myself of their youth. My first recognition of the changing profile of residents came several years later when one resident emphatically tried to win me over to his perspective that developing rapport with patients was complicated by English being his second language. This was echoed by other internationally trained residents, and gradually I began to see the evolution of a theme. The next prominent memory was several years ago when a resident spoke of civil war in her homeland that resulted in the death of her oldest brother. Several peers nodded their heads in an understanding born from similar shocking experiences of loss. As our small group sat around the conference table sharing stories of bereavement and its effect on their roles as physicians, something very special began to happen to me. I would like to share my thoughts. The cohort of residents in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan in Regina has undergone a huge transformation. A dozen years ago most, if not all, of our residents were born and educated in Canada. Today’s profile looks vastly different. More than half of our residents come to us from around the world and have graduated from a United Nations of medical schools and systems. English is their second or third language. Many have immigrated to Canada in search of a dream, a safe landing spot, an opportunity to grow perhaps in ways not available at home. These amazing individuals frequently relinquish successful medical careers in hope of working in their chosen professions in a new country. The struggles of these courageous men and women to obtain a residency spot in a Canadian department of medicine are worthy of legend. Once the prized position is obtained, the arduous journey continues as international medical graduates learn the ins and outs of the Canadian system while simultaneously striving to meet program standards. Many of these remarkable individuals are in their 30s and, yes, even 40s, are often parents and partners in dual-career marriages, and frequently have elderly parents in a homeland on another continent. Residency is just one of many responsibilities that must be met simultaneously. Yes, the profile of family medicine residents in Regina has gradually changed, and I am in the privileged position of teaching behavioural sciences to these magnificent people. It is an honour to participate in their journeys and to teach and learn from these courageous international medical graduates. Although I initially responded to the changing resident profile with some ambivalence, that has long since evaporated. Instead, I am humbled by our residents, am awed by their accomplishments, admire their flexibility and determination, and am deeply and genuinely proud to play even the smallest of roles in helping make some dreams come true. The world now seems smaller, the drama and foibles of the other side of the globe closer, and our responsibilities to one another more real. For all this, I have the international medical graduates to thank.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.064 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".