MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343875929 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2503742

Accurate Dynamic Phasor Estimation Based on the Signal Model Under Off-Nominal Frequency and Oscillations

2015· article· en· W2343875929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorControl theory (sociology)EstimatorElectric power systemTransient (computer programming)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePower (physics)MathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and fast estimation of power system phasors is the key to reliable operation of power system and its control/protective equipment. There have been many studies on phasor estimation techniques under dynamic and transient conditions. Although the performance under dynamic conditions of estimators based on the static phasor model has improved, significant errors still exist during large dynamic deviations. Two fast and precise dynamic phasor estimation algorithms under power system oscillations and off-nominal frequency conditions are described in this paper. The methods use the signal model under these dynamic conditions, linearize them by using Taylor's series expansion, and estimate the phasor using least squares technique. Frequency and its rate of change are also calculated using adjacent phasors with minimum complexity. Results obtained show that the performance errors of the proposed methods are way below the minimum requirement of the standard and better than other similar dynamic phasor algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it