MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343921671 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201600198

A Comparative Ancillary Ligand Survey in Palladium‐Catalyzed C–O Cross‐Coupling of Primary and Secondary Aliphatic Alcohols

2016· article· en· W2343921671 on OpenAlex
Ryan S. Sawatzky, Breanna K. V. Hargreaves, Mark Stradiotto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCatalysisPalladiumArylHalideLigand (biochemistry)Coupling reactionReactivity (psychology)Combinatorial chemistryPrimary (astronomy)Organic chemistryMedicinal chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The utility of RockPhos, Ad‐BippyPhos, JosiPhos (CyPF‐ t Bu), and Mor‐DalPhos in palladium‐catalyzed C–O cross‐coupling reactions involving aliphatic alcohols and (hetero)aryl halides under analogous conditions was examined, both at room temperature and at elevated temperature (90 °C). In general, the RockPhos‐based catalyst system proved superior, especially at room temperature, but catalysts based on the other ligands examined also proved effective across a range of C–O cross‐couplings, in some cases providing better catalytic performance than RockPhos. New reactivity was established in terms of the scope of room temperature reactions. Proof‐of‐principle examples of such cross‐couplings involving aryl mesylates were also demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it