MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343970457 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2014.901365

Complete moment convergence of weighted sums for arrays of negatively dependent random variables and its applications

2015· article· en· W2343970457 on OpenAlexaff
Yongfeng Wu, Andrei Volodin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceTongling UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Moment (physics)Pairwise comparisonMathematicsRandom variablePairwise independenceVariablesApplied mathematicsProofs of convergence of random variablesStatisticsConvergence of random variablesSum of normally distributed random variablesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors study the complete moment convergence of weighted sums for arrays of rowwise negatively dependent random variables. The obtained results improve the corresponding results of Baek and Park Citation(2010). Convergence of weighted sums for arrays of negatively dependent random variables and its applications. As an application, the authors obtain the complete moment convergence of linear processes based on pairwise negatively dependent random variables. In addition, the authors point out a gap of the proof in Baek and Park Citation(2010) and raise an open problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207