A Modular Multilevel Converter With DC Fault Handling Capability and Enhanced Efficiency for HVdc System Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a modular multilevel converter (MMC) topology for high-voltage dc (HVdc) system applications. The proposed MMC employs two half-bridge converters, a cascade of networks that consist of electronic switches, and multiple capacitors. Thus, charged capacitors are inserted in series with the arm current path, for a desired level of the output ac voltage. The switches that must be turned on are judiciously selected for the most efficient current path. The proposed MMC also offers dc-side fault handling capability. The paper compares the proposed MMC with the half-bridge submodule-based MMC, full-bridge submodule-based MMC, and clamp-double submodule-based MMC technologies. It is shown that the proposed MMC is more efficient than the three aforementioned MMC technologies, while it offers the same fault handling capability as that of an equivalent full-bridge-based MMC. Time-domain simulation studies confirm the effectiveness of the proposed MMC under various normal and faulted operating scenarios, using detailed as well as reduced models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".