Agricultural Cooperative Movement Under the Regulation of the Mainstream Ideology in China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the successful seizure of power by the Communist Party of China, Marxism has become a new China’s mainstream ideology, Agricultural Cooperative Movement was a relationship of agricultural production, which started in 1953 under the guidance of strict ideological thought. In practice agricultural co-operation, there has been a lot of problems and contradictions, which proved a tortuous ideological control under agricultural development, but also that the ideology of the concrete practice of excessive labor intervention is not conducive to the development of labor productivity and motivation increase. From the perspective of historical development, the reform and opening up, the party and state leaders re-examine the relationship between ideology and agricultural development, and form the household contract responsibility system, and new agricultural management system, and the new science of agriculture policy. Recalling the agricultural cooperative movement to clear agricultural development we must turn to the “trial and error” real logic has an important inspiration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it