Les périodiques en généalogie et en histoire de la famille : des ressources très utiles, mais peu exploitées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En héritant de l’ensemble de la collection de ressources en généalogie de la salle Gagnon de la défunte Bibliothèque centrale de Montréal en 2005, le Centre d’archives de Montréal reçoit notamment une grande quantité de revues de ce domaine. Cette acquisition enrichit avantageusement la collection de revues du Centre, jusque-là plutôt modeste. Ce sont plus de 280 titres différents qui forment aujourd’hui cette collection qui compte bien sûr des publications québécoises, mais aussi canadiennes, américaines et européennes. Même s’il n’est pas rare que l’on voie des usagers se consacrer au dépouillement des numéros de l’une ou l’autre de ces revues, il serait faux de dire que le potentiel de ces périodiques pour la recherche en généalogie est bien connu. Notre objectif est donc de valoriser cette collection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.027 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".