MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344204337

Relationship of health related quality of life to prevalent and new or worsening back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

2005· article· en· W2344204337 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stuart L. Silverman, Veronica Piziak, Peiqi Chen, Derek Misurski, Rachel B. Wagman

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyOsteoporosisBack painQuality of life (healthcare)PlaceboAdverse effectLow back painInternal medicineAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between back pain and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: The Fracture Prevention Trial was a prospective double blinded, placebo controlled study designed to compare the proportion of women receiving teriparatide who experienced a new fracture to the proportion of women receiving placebo who experienced a new fracture. Subjects were ambulatory postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and prior vertebral fracture. As part of this trial, English-speaking women from Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States participated in a HRQOL substudy using the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ). OPAQ was administered at baseline, 12 months, and at study termination (median treatment duration 19 mo). Back pain data were collected as part of the adverse event monitoring during the trial. Subjects considered to have experienced back pain reported this event spontaneously and were not queried specifically. We examined the influence of prevalent back pain on HRQOL after controlling for spine deformity index score, and the influence of new or worsening back pain on HRQOL after controlling for incident vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Of 471 women who completed OPAQ at baseline, 172 reported back pain that was associated with a mean decrease in all OPAQ dimension scores (p < 0.05). Of 429 women who completed OPAQ at all timepoints, 88 experienced new or worsening back pain that was associated with a mean decrease in physical function, emotional status, and symptoms scores (p < 0.01 for each). In a subset of 65 women who experienced moderate to severe back pain, all OPAQ dimensions were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both prevalent back pain and new or worsening back pain affected HRQOL negatively. Osteoporosis therapies that prevent the development of back pain in postmenopausal women may also prevent decreases in HRQOL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207