MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344380352 · doi:10.14288/1.0076767

Special lecture on Asian migration history

2014· article· en· W2344380352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henry Yu

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Webcast sponsored by the Irving K. Barber Learning Centre and hosted by the Asian Canadian and Asian Migration Studies (ACAM) program as part of the honouring of Dr. Henry Sugiyama. An 87-year-old Canadian doctor of Japanese ancestry, Dr. Sugiyama is the first student in a new UBC program on Asian Canadian studies. This is a special lecture presentation from History 483 - Asian Migrations to the Americas - taught by UBC History Professor Dr. Henry Yu. Migration from Asia was, and remains, a formative influence on the social, economic, cultural and political life of the Americas. This course will explore the history of migration from Asia to, and throughout, Canada, the United States and Mexico from the late 19th to the early 21st century. It will examine the impact of migration from different parts of Asia on local, national and transnational communities. Through a variety of readings and engaged seminar discussions, we will explore a range of topics including contested conceptions of Asian-ness, the relationship between migration and indigeneity in the Americas and how perceptions of arriving migrants changed over time. We will contribute our own understandings and interpretations to historiographical discussions as well as contemporary debates about migration from Asia to, and throughout, the Americas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2430.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207