MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344448545 · doi:10.1142/s0219720016500190

A novel Arg H52/Tyr H33 conservative motif in antibodies: A correlation between sequence of antibodies and antigen binding

2016· article· en· W2344448545 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Artem Petrov, Vladimir K. Arzhanik, G. I. Makarov, О. В. Колясников

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsSequence motifAntibodyAntigenSequence (biology)Motif (music)Molecular biologyComputational biologyBiologyChemistryGeneticsPhysicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antibodies are the family of proteins, which are responsible for antigen recognition. The computational modeling of interaction between an antigen and an antibody is very important when crystallographic structure is unavailable. In this research, we have discovered the correlation between the amino acid sequence of antibody and its specific binding characteristics on the example of the novel conservative binding motif, which consists of four residues: Arg H52, Tyr H33, Thr H59, and Glu H61. These residues are specifically oriented in the binding site and interact with each other in a specific manner. The residues of the binding motif are involved in interaction strictly with negatively charged groups of antigens, and form a binding complex. Mechanism of interaction and characteristics of the complex were also discovered. The results of this research can be used to increase the accuracy of computational antibody-antigen interaction modeling and for post-modeling quality control of the modeled structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational BiologySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207