MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344488400 · doi:10.1145/2927964.2927973

Efficient Mapping and Allocation of Execution Units to Task Graphs using an Evolutionary Framework

2016· article· en· W2344488400 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationComputer scienceTask (project management)Field-programmable gate arrayGenetic algorithmExecution timePower consumptionMulti-objective optimizationPower (physics)Distributed computingParallel computingEmbedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial dynamic reconfiguration of FPGAs gives designers the capability to change certain parts of the hardware while other parts remain active and in use. This provides several benefits including reducing device count and power consumption. However, this also introduces new challenges that need to be addressed by designers. This paper introduces a framework for efficient mapping of execution units to task graphs in a runtime reconfigurable system. The framework utilizes an Island Based Genetic Algorithm flow that optimizes several objectives including delay and power consumption. The GA based technique not only optimizes the above objectives, but also aggregates the Pareto front of the different islands to further enhance solution quality. The Island based GA runs each GA in parallel, and is amenable to both software and hardware implementation. The proposed Island based GA framework achieves on average 55.2% improvement over a single GA implementation and 80.7% improvement over a baseline random allocation and binding approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it