Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exploité depuis l’Antiquité, l’or de Transylvanie constitue l’une des richesses minières les plus importantes de Roumanie. La région de Roşia Montană a été l’un des centres majeurs d’extraction de l’or, mais l’épuisement des filons accessibles a entraîné un long déclin qui fait de cette région l’une des plus pauvres de Roumanie. Depuis la fin du régime communiste, un nouveau projet minier dirigé par une société canadienne a été proposé. Mais ce projet de grande ampleur qui prévoit le creusement de grandes exploitations à ciel ouvert et l’utilisation de traitements du minerai au cyanure se heurte à une opposition résolue d’une partie de la population locale, soutenue par de nombreuses organisations non gouvernementales. Face au projet minier que la société canadienne présente comme la seule opportunité de développement économique d’une région très pauvre, les opposants défendent l’option d’une autre forme de développement durable, reposant sur l’exploitation des ressources touristiques de la région.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".