MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344657874 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12599

Wind exposure and light exposure, more than elevation‐related temperature, limit tree line seedling abundance on three continents

2016· article· en· W2344657874 on OpenAlexafffund
Eliot J. B. McIntire, Frida I. Piper, Alex Fajardo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCanadian Forest Service
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTree lineEnvironmental scienceElevation (ballistics)SeedlingAltitude (triangle)Atmospheric sciencesGlobal warmingClimate changeAbundance (ecology)Global changeEcologyBiologyAgronomyGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The transition from seedlings into trees at alpine tree lines is a temperature‐limited process that ultimately sets the tree line elevation at a global scale. As such, tree lines may be key bioassays of global warming effects on species distributions. For global warming to promote upward tree line migration, as predicted, seedlings must be available. We examined, for the first time at a global scale, elevational patterns and drivers of seedling availability at tree lines. Working at 10 sites across five mountain regions (dry Andes, humid Andes, Patagonian Andes, Swiss Alps and US Rocky Mountains) with different tree line forms (abrupt and diffuse) and dominated by different tree species (broadleaves and conifers), we answered the following question: How is seedling abundance affected by elevation (as a coarse grain surrogate of temperature), light exposure (openness immediately above plots) or wind exposure (an index for openness in the horizontal direction), or combinations thereof and what is the relative importance of each factor? We tested five biological hypotheses to determine the relative strength of these tree line drivers on variable‐size sampling plots of seedling abundance ( S ) ( n = 1056). Specifically, we tested likely combinations of temperature limitation ( T ), light as a resource (light, L ) and as a radiation stress (via high light at low temperature, R ), wind exposure as a tree line stressor ( W ) and tree line form (a coarse scale test: abrupt vs. diffuse, D ). We found strong, moderate and weak negative effects of our estimates of wind exposure, radiation stress and elevation‐related temperature on seedling abundance, respectively. We also found a positive effect, at tree line, for site‐level tree line diffuseness. Two distinct facilitation mechanisms likely improved seedling abundance at tree line elevation: wind blockage by neighbourhood trees (the sheltering effect) and partial shading by overhead trees. Synthesis . Seedling abundance at alpine tree lines is limited by multiple simultaneous factors with the temperature decrease with elevation playing a relatively minor role. We therefore note that if the temperature threshold limiting the conversion from seedlings to adult trees is relaxed because of global warming, upward tree line migration will depend on the availability of shelter sites for seedlings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207