MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344659650 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2527022

DRX With Quick Sleeping: A Novel Mechanism for Energy-Efficient IoT Using LTE/LTE-A

2016· article· en· W2344659650 on OpenAlexafffund
Naveen Mysore Balasubramanya, Lutz Lampe, Gustav Vos, Steve Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsSierra Wireless (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersMitacs
KeywordsUser equipmentComputer scienceLTE Advanced3rd Generation Partnership Project 2Computer networkEfficient energy useEnergy consumptionTransmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Telecommunications linkSynchronization (alternating current)Real-time computingBase stationTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has recognized machine-type communications (MTCs) as a vital medium to drive the Internet of Things (IoT). One of the key challenges in MTC is to reduce the energy consumption of the MTC user equipment (UE). Currently, the 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE)/LTE-advanced (LTE-A) standards incorporate discontinuous reception (DRX) mechanism for this purpose. In this paper, we propose a modified DRX mechanism incorporating the quick sleeping indication (QSI) as a novel, simple, and energy-efficient solution for low-complexity, low-mobility MTC UEs. We demonstrate our QSI transmission mechanisms using the broadcast and synchronization channels of LTE/LTE-A for MTC UEs in normal coverage and using the data channel for MTC UEs operating in “coverage enhancement” (CE) mode. For MTC UEs in normal coverage, our simulation results and analysis show that our DRX with QSI mechanisms result in 45% improvement in the energy efficiency and 66% reduction in the computational complexity at the UE receiver, when compared to the current DRX mechanism. For MTC UEs with CE, the energy and computational efficiency increase to 63% and 68%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207