MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344734856 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.150451

Including males in Canadian human papillomavirus vaccination programs: a policy analysis

2016· article· en· W2344734856 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Gilla K. Shapiro, Samara Perez, Zeev Rosberger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsBivalent (engine)Human papillomavirusHuman papillomavirus vaccineVaccinationAdvisory committeeImmunizationImmunization programMedicineFamily medicineVirologyPolitical scienceDemographyCervical cancerGardasilImmunologyPublic administrationSociologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for females aged 9–26 years (bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine) and males aged 9–26 years (quadrivalent vaccine) ([Figure 1][1]).[1][2] All Canadian provinces and territories

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207