MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344834536 · doi:10.7202/1033569ar

La Cité nationale de l’histoire de l’immigration

2009· article· fr· W2344834536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hélène Lafont‐Couturier

Bibliographic record

VenueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieures · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Cite nationale de l’histoire de l’immigration est tout a la fois un musee national, une mediatheque, un espace de decouvertes, d’expositions et d’expression des arts vivants. La creation de la Cite est une reponse a « une forte demande de la societe, illustree par les nombreuses initiatives associatives qui ont emerge a partir de la fin des annees 1980 et n’ont cesse de se multiplier. Un rapport est remis au Premier ministre en novembre 2001 par Driss El Yazami et Remy Schwartz. Engagement de l’Etat sur ce projet qui s’est traduit par la lettre de mission du Premier ministre a Jacques Toubon en mars 2003, la mission de prefiguration s’est conclue par la remise d’un rapport en mai 2004 et a ete suivie par l’annonce immediate en juillet 2004 de la mise en œuvre de ce nouvel etablissement. Il faut a ce sujet souligner l’engagement tout a fait exceptionnel de l’Etat dans un projet de musee national a caractere social et politique. Jusqu’alors les grands projets presidentiels concernaient des musees d’art. L’ouverture au public en octobre 2007 du musee national de l’histoire et des cultures de l’immigration marque la premiere etape de fonctionnement de la Cite La rehabilitation du bâtiment confiee a Patrick Bouchain s’achevera en 2009, avec l’ouverture au public de la mediatheque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieuresSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207