MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344850239 · doi:10.4000/abstractairanica.4941

Jules Janssens. « Mulla Sadra’s Use of Ibn Sina’s Ta‘liqat in the Asfar ». Journal of Islamic Studies 13, 1 (2002), pp. 1-13.

2004· article· fr· W2344850239 on OpenAlexaff
Colin Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracta Iranica · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Classical Philosophy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPhilosophyCITESEpistemologyHumanitiesTheologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, Jules Janssens sheds further light on the extent to which late medieval Perso-Islamic philosophers like Mulla Sadra adhered to Avicennian principles and models in their own work. Not surprisingly, Mulla Sadra cites well-known works by Ibn Sina (such as al-Shifa’ and al-Najat), but Janssens draws us to the fact that the Asfar (more formally known as al-hikmat al-muta‘aliyya fi l-Asfar al-‘aqliyyat al-arba‘a) on occasion makes periodic references and allusions to yet another Av...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracta IranicaSame topicMedieval and Classical PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207