MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344942438 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2015-0576

Synthesis of a new DTTA- and 5-phenyl-2,2′-bipyridine-based ditopic ligand and its Eu<sup>3+</sup> complex

2016· article· en· W2344942438 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dmitry S. Kopchuk, D. E. Pavlyuk, Igor S. Коvalev, Grigory V. Zyryanov, В. Л. Русинов, Олег Н. Чупахин

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistryPhosphorescenceFluorescenceLigand (biochemistry)ChelationQuenching (fluorescence)BipyridineAqueous solution2,2'-BipyridineMedicinal chemistryLuminescenceInorganic chemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryCrystal structureReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new ditopic ligand based on diethylenetriamine-N,N,N″,N″-tetraacetate (DTTA) and 5-phenyl-2,2′-bipyridine has been synthesized. The improved method for the synthesis of DTTA tert-butyl ester has been developed. The water-soluble Eu3+*DTTA complex of this ligand has been prepared, and its photophysical properties have been studied. Due to the presence of an extra chelating unit, 5-phenyl-2,2′-bipyridine, this Eu3+*DTTA complex demonstrated a strong fluorescence response to the Zn2+ cation (fluorescence enhancement) and the simultaneous fluorescent and phosphorescent response (fluorescence and phosphorescence quenching) to the Cu2+ or Ni2+ cations in aqueous solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207