MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2345089505 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0013

Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their targets from expression sequence tags of <i>Ribes nigrum</i>

2016· article· en· W2345089505 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Xin Xie, Xuyan Li, Youxia Tian, Mojie Su, Jiayan Zhang, Xue Han, Yuhai Cui, Shaomin Bian

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRibesmicroRNAGeneGeneticsComputational biologyExpressed sequence tagGene expressionBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous, single-stranded, approximately 21 nt in length, non-coding RNAs which play critical roles in plant biological and metabolic processes. Although numerous miRNAs have been identified in many plant species, miRNAs still remain totally unknown in Ribes nigrum. In the study, two miRNAs (rni-miR5021 and rni-miR5185) were firstly identified in Ribes nigrum using an expression sequence tag (EST)-based comparative genomics approach. Subsequently, transgenic analysis suggested that these putative MIR genes encoding rni-miR5021 and rni-miR5185 were able to generate their corresponding miRNA in vivo. Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis indicated that the expression patterns of the MIR genes varied among blackcurrant tissues, and the two mature miRNAs showed higher accumulation in fruits than other tissues. Finally, 47 targets were predicted for the two miRNAs, which are involved in response to stresses and other plant biological processes. These findings will facilitate future studies on the functions and regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs in Ribes nigrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→