Optimal Relay Selection and Power Control With Quality-of-Service Provisioning in Wireless Body Area Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A game-theoretic approach is proposed to investigate the problem of relay selection and power control with quality of service constraints in multiple-access wireless body area networks (WBANs). Each sensor node seeks a strategy that ensures the optimal energy efficiency and, at the same time, provides a guaranteed upper bound on the end-to-end packet delay and jitter. The existence of Nash equilibrium for the proposed non-cooperative game is proved, the Nash power control solution is analytically calculated, and a distributed algorithm is provided that converges to a Nash relay selection solution. The game theoretic analysis is then employed in an IEEE 802.15.6-based WBAN to gauge the validity and effectiveness of the proposed framework. Performance behaviors in terms of energy efficiency and end-to-end delay and jitter are examined for various scenarios. Results demonstrate the merits of the proposed framework, particularly for moving WBANs under severe fading conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it