MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345292287 · doi:10.1109/irsec.2015.7455086

Development of renewable energy laboratory based on integration of wind, solar and biodiesel energies through a virtual and physical environment

2015· article· en· W2345292287 on OpenAlexaff
Soro S. Martin, Ahmed Chebak, N. Barka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemAutomotive engineeringMaximum power point trackingWind powerSolar energyEngineeringElectrical engineeringWind speedComputer scienceMeteorologyVoltageInverterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the concept of novel educational renewable energy laboratory. The proposed laboratory objective is to allow students to learn all aspects of renewable energies and take hands-on equipment's for better understanding of clean energy technologies. This laboratory includes a hybrid power system (HPS) integrating wind energy conversion system (WECS), photovoltaic (PV) panel, biodiesel generator, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controllers and storage battery. In this paper, the whole HPS dimensioning is performed and the three renewable energy source systems are simulated and analyzed separately. The PV panels are examined under solar radiation and cell temperature variation conditions. The solar power functioning are verified and studied through a direct connection to battery and resistive load. The WECS is also analyzed through the same connection under constant wind's speed and variable wind's speed. Furthermore, the biodiesel generator using permanent magnet synchronous machine was simulated and analyzed. The laboratory physical environment is described and the virtual platform is presented. The e-learning concept and the laboratory learning topics are also developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207