Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Lazer – RBEL surge como uma ação prioritária da ANPEL, enquanto veículo de difusão das pesquisas temáticas ao lazer. Tal Revista representa assim um singular avanço na disseminação do conhecimento no lazer a exemplo do que já tradicionalmente ocorre com outras relevantes associações similares pelo mundo que também lançaram seus respectivos periódicos, como o Annals of Leisure Research da Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies – ANZALS (Austrália e Nova Zelândia), a Loisir/Leisure da Canadian Association for Leisure Studies – CALS (Canadá), o Leisure Studies Journal da Leisure Studies Association – LSA (Reino Unido) e o World Leisure Journal da World Leisure Organization (Organização das Nações Unidas).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".