MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345356515 · doi:10.2427/18993

Editorial

2022· article· en· W2345356515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefania Boccia, Roberta Pastorino

Bibliographic record

VenueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Personalized medicineAttendanceMedicineIdentification (biology)Sociotechnical systemHealth careMarie curieMultidisciplinary approachMedical educationKnowledge managementPolitical scienceBusinessBioinformaticsComputer scienceEuropean union

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Funded in the context of the first call of the Marie Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) 2014 of Horizon 2020, the PREvention of Chronic DIseases consortium (PRECeDI, http://www.precedi.eu/) aims to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary knowledge through training and research in personalized medicine with specific focus on the personalized prevention of chronic diseases. There is a large consensus that personalized medicine is a driver of innovation for research and health care, and also for the health care system and industry as a whole [1]. In order to harness the potential of this new concept, the “PRECeDI” consortium aims to train staff from academic and non-academic institutions on several research topics related to personalized prevention of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. The acquisition of skills from researchers will come from dedicated secondments aimed at training on different research topics not available at the home institutions; attendance to training courses, workshops, seminars, conferences. In details, five research domains will be addresses: 1) identification and validation of biomarkers for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, secondary prevention of Alzheimer, and tertiary prevention of head and neck cancer; 2) economic evaluation of genomic applications; 3) ethical-legal and policy issues surrounding personalized medicine; 4) sociotechnical analysis of the pros-and cons of informing healthy individuals on their genome; 5) identification of organizational models for the provision of predictive genetic testing. PRECeDI is embedded in existing cooperation structures, such as the Erasmus Mundus ERAWEB II program, with additional leading small-medium enterprises (SMEs) in Europe and Canada as beneficiaries. The consortium consists of 9 beneficiaries, namely the Institute of Public Health, Universita del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Better Value Healthcare Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Infectiuos Diseaseses and Hygiene, Universita La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Section Community Genetics, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands; LINKCARE Health Services S.L., Barcelona, Spain; Erasmus Universitait Medisch Centrum, Department of Epidemiology, Rotterdam, (1) Section of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Universita

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)Same topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207