La presse nationale britannique et le Mandat du Royaume-Uni en Palestine (1922-1939)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les gouvernements britanniques qui se sont succédé au pouvoir au cours de l’Entre-deux guerres se sont invariablement heurtés à l’insoluble contradiction en germe dans la Déclaration Balfour. De Livres blancs en rapports de commissions, la position des responsables britanniques évoluera vers une plus grande prise en compte des réalités palestiniennes, avant que la Deuxième Guerre mondiale n’impose d’autres priorités.La question palestinienne est globalement peu traitée par la presse britannique, à l’exception de certains titres dont les propriétaires ont défendu leur vision personnelle de l’engagement britannique en Palestine, jugé coûteux et voué à l’échec. Telle était notamment la position de lord Northcliffe, largement développée dans le Daily Mail et, dans une moindre mesure, dans le Times qui a essentiellement servi de tribune aux différents protagonistes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".