MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345503703 · doi:10.1093/whq/40.3.395

Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World's Longest Undefended Border Across the Western Plains

2009· article· en· W2345503703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jefferson Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Historical Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArc (geometry)HistoryLine (geometry)Library scienceIndex (typography)GeographyDemographyArchaeologySociologyComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World's Longest Undefended Border Across the Western Plains Get access Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World's Longest Undefended Border Across the Western Plains. By Rees Tony. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press and Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2007. xiv + 393 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, index. $29.95.) J. Wendel Cox J. Wendel Cox Denver Public Library Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Western Historical Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 3, Autumn 2009, Pages 395–396, https://doi.org/10.1093/whq/40.3.395 Published: 01 August 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Historical QuarterlySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207