MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345530030 · doi:10.1090/jams/861

Diagonal cycles and Euler systems II: The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for Hasse-Weil-Artin 𝐿-functions

2016· article· en· W2345530030 on OpenAlexafffund
Henri Darmon, Víctor Rotger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Mathematical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureGalois moduleModular formElliptic curvePure mathematicsCohomologyDimension (graph theory)DiagonalOrder (exchange)Rank (graph theory)Euler's formulaShimura varietyCombinatoricsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article establishes new cases of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture in analytic rank 0 0 , for elliptic curves over Q \mathbb {Q} viewed over the fields cut out by certain self-dual Artin representations of dimension at most 4 4 . When the associated L L -function vanishes (to even order ≥ 2 \ge 2 ) at its central point, two canonical classes in the corresponding Selmer group are constructed and shown to be linearly independent assuming the non-vanishing of a Garrett-Hida p p -adic L L -function at a point lying outside its range of classical interpolation. The key tool for both results is the study of certain p p -adic families of global Galois cohomology classes arising from Gross-Kudla-Schoen diagonal cycles in a tower of triple products of modular curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207