MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345594382 · doi:10.1145/2910925.2910935

Ranking in Professional Sports

2016· article· en· W2345594382 on OpenAlexaff
Charles D. Hepler, Pamini Thangarajah, Peter Zizler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationLinear algebraComputer scienceSchema (genetic algorithms)Class (philosophy)Ranking (information retrieval)InstitutionAlgebra over a fieldMultimediaMathematicsInformation retrievalSociologyPure mathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linear algebra is one of the required mathematics courses for students majoring in computer science. With the small class sizes at our institution, we have the opportunity to use teaching strategies often reserved for senior level courses at larger universities. In this paper the authors discuss their experience with an innovative project schema that is designed for students in an elementary linear algebra course, and how it fullfills the requirements from the report to ACM [11].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistics Education and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207