Variabilité socio-écologique, crise du pastoralisme et résilience des Peuls pasteurs du Gourma rural (Burkina Faso)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combinant recherche empirique et état de l’art sur les pratiques pastorales comme les régimes de propriété animale des sociétés pastorales d’Afrique et du Burkina Faso en particulier, cet article explore les dispositifs de résilience des Peuls pasteurs du Gourma rural dans un environnement marqué par des variations écologiques, des conflits d’usage des ressources naturelles et l’insertion de l’élevage dans l’économie de marché. En effet, pour tempérer les effets des aléas écologiques et du changement socio-économique, les Peuls pasteurs recourent à la mobilité pastorale, à la vente circonstancielle d’animaux au profit d’investissements alternatifs dans le foncier et l’immobilier locatif urbain. La multiplicité des formes d’adaptation à la vulnérabilité écologique et socio-pastorale témoigne de la flexibilité de la rationalité pratique des Peuls pasteurs du Gourma rural.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".