MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DISTRIBUTION AND EXPRESSION OF TRANSGENE GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN IN MICE SURVIVING UP TO 4 WEEKS FOLLOWING IN UTERO GENE THERAPY.

2007· article· en· W2345798255 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick T. Yang, Lu Huang, William Jia, Candice Sy, Erik D. Skarsgard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Investigative Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgeneIn uteroGreen fluorescent proteinGenetic enhancementDistribution (mathematics)BiologyGeneProtein expressionGene expressionGenetically modified mouseAndrologyMedicineGeneticsPregnancyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gene replacement offers a potential cure for degenerative disorders caused by a single gene deletion or mutation. Diagnoses of monogenic disorders in the fetus enable prenatal gene replacement, which may be beneficial from the perspectives of host inflammatory/immune response, efficacy, and disease prevention. Purpose The purpose of our study was to evaluate the distribution and expression of reporter gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the tissues of mice surviving up to 1 month following in utero gene therapy. Methods Used Vesicular stomatitis virus-G (VSV-G) pseudotyped lentiviral (LV) vector containing GFP was prepared via triple plasmid cotransfection. Time-mated CD-1 mice underwent individual amniotic sac injection with either 1 × 106 LV particles or saline (controls) on gestational day 16 (term = 21 days) and were allowed to undergo spontaneous parturition. Pups were sacrificed on postnatal days 0, 7, 21, and 28, and neonatal and maternal tissues were analyzed for GFP transgene (by DNA polymerase chain reaction; PCR) and transgene expression by quantitative reverse transcriptase (QRT) PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Summary of Results We observed selective transduction of neonatal tissues (trachea, lung, liver, heart, kidney, spleen, intestine, skeletal muscle) in pups undergoing in utero transfection with LV-GFP. Maternal tissues did not contain transgene despite exposure during amniotic injection. Although the number of pups analyzed at each postnatal time point was small, we observed variable persistence of GFP expression that appeared to be tissue specific (with persistent expression noted in the intestine of 4-week-old pups). Conclusions Neonatal tissue transfection occurs in a variety of tissues following amniotic injection with LV-GFP in this murine model of in utero gene therapy. Transgene persistence and expression patterns observed over the first 4 weeks of life may reflect tissue-specific genomic insertion of transgene that favors persistent transcription in select tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Investigative MedicineSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207