MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reduction in late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2015· article· en· W2345828629 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory T. Armstrong, Yutaka Yasui, Yan Chen, Wendy M. Leisenring, Todd M. Gibson, Ann C. Mertens, Marilyn Stovall, Melissa M. Hudson, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Smita Bhatia, Kevin R. Krull, Paul C. Nathan, Joseph Philip Neglia, Daniel M. Green, Leslie L. Robison

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePoisson regressionCumulative incidenceRelative riskCancerInternal medicineConfidence intervalIncidence (geometry)Late effectRadiation therapyPediatricsSurgeryCohortPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA2 Background: Over the past four decades, treatment of many childhood cancers has been modified with the aim of achieving high survival rates while reducing the risk of life-threatening late-effects, and promoting risk-based follow-up care of survivors. Methods: Late mortality was evaluated in 34,033 5-year survivors (diagnosed < 21 years of age from 1970-1999, median follow-up 21 years, range 5-38) using cumulative incidence and Poisson regression models adjusted for demographic and disease factors to calculate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mortality due to non-recurrence/non-external (NR/NE) causes, which includes deaths that reflect late-effects of cancer therapy, was evaluated. Results: 1,622 (41%) of the 3,958 deaths were attributable to NR/NE causes, including 751 subsequent neoplasm (SN), 243 cardiac, and 136 pulmonary deaths. Changes in therapy by decade included reduced rates of: cranial radiotherapy (RT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 86%, 54%, 22%), RT for Wilms tumor (WT, 77%, 54%, 49%) and RT for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL, 96%, 88%, 77%). Reductions in 15 year cumulative NR/NE mortality were observed across treatment eras for ALL (p < .001), HL (p = .005), and WT (p = .005). Cardiac deaths decreased in ALL (p = .002), HL (p = .06), and WT (p = .04), and SN deaths decreased in WT (p < .001). Year of diagnosis (adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, follow-up time) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.85, CI 0.83-0.87), NR/NE death (RR = 0.87, CI 0.84-0.91), death from SN (RR = 0.84, CI 0.80-0.89), cardiac death (RR = 0.78, CI 0.69-0.87) and pulmonary death (RR = 0.79, CI 0.68-0.91). Conclusions: The CCSS cohort provides evidence that the strategy of modifying therapy to reduce the occurrence of late-effects, and promotion of early detection, is successfully translating into a significant reduction in observed late mortality. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→