Réécriture fictionnelle de l’histoire dans la satire des romans de voyage au XVIIIe siècle, l’exemple des <i>Voyages de Gulliver</i> (1726) de Jonathan Swift et de <i>Micromégas</i> (1752) de Voltaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’étudier la place qu’occupait au XVIIIe siècle la satire dans les fictions des romans de voyages. Fondé sur la critique des mœurs de la société, le genre du « roman-satire » pose problème quant à l’usage que les fictions dix-huitiémistes en ont fait : les thèmes historiques qui s’y dégagent se communiquent dans une singulière interversion de l’imaginaire et de l’historique. En examinant deux textes constitués par cette formule (Les Voyages de Gulliver et Micromégas), l’étude veut analyser les opérations narratives qui auraient donné lieu à une version adaptée de la réalité historique vécue à l’époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".