Small Molecule PRIMA-1 met Sensitizes Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Cells To Apoptosis and Displays Synergistic Cytotoxicity With Bortezomib
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by heterogeneous infiltration of bone marrow and IgM monoclonal gammopathy. WM constitutes 1-2% of haematological malignancies and patients exhibit diverse outcome. Given the current therapies WM remains incurable with high rate of relapse, therefore, the quest for finding a more effective drug continues. PRIMA-1met is a small molecule with the ability to restore wild type conformation to mutant P53 and to activate wild type P53. PRIMA-1met has shown significant anti-tumour activity both in vitro and in vivo by inducing apoptosis in several human cancers including haematological malignancies and is currently under phase I/II clinical trials. To date, the effects of PRIMA-1met have not been explored in WM. Here we examined the antitumor activity of PRIMA-1met alone and in combination with dexamethasone or bortezomib in WM. Design WM cell lines, BCWM-1(Wild type P53) and MWCL-1 (mutant P53), were used for these studies. Cellular proliferation, viability, migration and percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis in WM cells treated with PRIMA-1met or DMSO control were evaluated using trypan blue, MTT assay, Boyden chamber assay and Annexin-V staining methods respectively. The status of key role players in apoptosis and cell cycle regulators were examined following treatment with PRIMA-1met using qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses. Cell viability was also investigated by combining PRIMA-1metwith either dexamethasone or bortezomib in WM cells by MTT assay. Result Both BCWM-1 and MWCL-1 cells showed significant decrease in cell viability after exposure to escalating doses of PRIMA-1met with observed IC50 of 30 μM in BCWM-1 cells and 28 μM in MWCL-1 cells after 48 hours. Two primary WM patients’ samples exposed to increasing concentration of PRIMA-1met demonstrated significant decrease in cell viability with IC50 of 30 and 10 μM after 48 hours. Importantly, peripheral and bone marrow mononuclear cells of 3 healthy donors were subjected to PRIMA-1met and no significant cytotoxicity was observed. Both cell lines showed an increase in apoptosis after PRIMA-1met treatment in a dose-dependent manner compared to control DMSO treatment. In BCWM-1, cell proliferation, measured by counting viable cells after 7 days, was significantly inhibited by PRIMA-1met compared to DMSO control (∼54% fewer cells when treated with 25 μM PRIMA-1met, p<0.05). Decrease in cell migration by as much as 28% at 25 μM compared to DMSO control (p<0.001) was also observed after 8 hours of treatment with PRIMA-1met. Expressions of P53 and its downstream target p21 were elevated in PRIMA-1met treated cells compared to DMSO control. In addition, qRT-PCR studies of 50 genes associated with apoptosis also demonstrated enhanced expression of pro-apoptotic markers such as PUMA, Noxa, caspase 8 and 9, BIM and BAD, which were further confirmed for their protein expressions by Western blot analysis. Finally, PRIMA-1met (25 μM) was found to exert synergistic cytotoxic effect in combination with dexamethasone (2 μM) in MWCL-1 cells (Combination index (CI)=0.5). PRIMA-1met (25 μM) also displayed synergism with bortezomib (3 μM) in its cytotoxicity toward BCWM-1 cells (CI=0.8). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that PRIMA-1met induces apoptosis irrespective of P53 status in WM cells. It also provides the preclinical framework for evaluation of PRIMA-1met either alone or in combination with bortezomib or dexamethasone as a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of WM patients. Disclosures: Chen: Roche: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".