An Approach To “Quantumness” In Coherent Control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter examines quantum control from a foundational perspective, relying upon modern concepts in quantum mechanics, such as entanglement, quantum erasure, nonlocality, and Bell tests to see how a truly quantum phase control scenario can be tested and built. It provides a detailed approach to examining the role of quantum mechanics in control scenarios that is applicable to other coherent control and to optimal control scenarios. The chapter further discusses ways to demonstrate complementarity in new, unconventional scenarios of true quantum coherent phase control, scenarios in which nonlinear response theory cannot be applied. It then addresses the question of how and when nontrivial aspects of quantum interference affect phase control. In this context, quantum interference and quantum mechanics are essentially synonymous. Since these aspects are absent in conventional phase control, the chapter extends the search to unconventional scenarios. To do so, it introduces a novel type of two-path interferometer, the “coherent control interferometer” (CCI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it