MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345995128 · doi:10.1039/c6sc00512h

Structural changes correlated with magnetic spin state isomorphism in the S<sub>2</sub> state of the Mn<sub>4</sub>CaO<sub>5</sub> cluster in the oxygen-evolving complex of photosystem II

2016· article· en· W2345995128 on OpenAlexaff
Ruchira Chatterjee, Guangye Han, Jan Kern, Sheraz Gul, Franklin D. Fuller, Anna Garachtchenko, I.D. Young, Tsu-Chien Weng, Dennis Nordlund, Roberto Alonso‐Mori, Uwe Bergmann, Dimosthenis Sokaras, Makoto Hatakeyama, Vittal K. Yachandra, Junko Yano

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchBasic Energy SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesOffice of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCluster (spacecraft)State (computer science)Isomorphism (crystallography)Spin (aerodynamics)Spin statesOxygenCrystallographyMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysicsChemical physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceCrystal structureComputer scienceThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

states are different as determined using Mn EXAFS and XANES/XES, respectively. The Mn K-edge XANES and XES for the HS form are different from the LS and indicate a slightly lower positive charge on the Mn atoms compared to the LS form. Based on the EXAFS results which are clearly different, we propose possible structural differences between the two spin states. Such structural and magnetic redox-isomers if present at room temperature, will likely play a role in the mechanism for water-exchange/oxidation in photosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207