MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346093359 · doi:10.1002/ana.24650

Whole exome sequencing in patients with white matter abnormalities

2016· article· en· W2346093359 on OpenAlexafffund
Adeline Vanderver, Cas Simons, Guy Helman, Joanna Crawford, Nicole I. Wolf, Geneviève Bernard, Amy Pizzino, Johanna Schmidt, Asako Takanohashi, David S. Miller, Amirah Khouzam, Vani Rajan, Erica Ramos, Shimul Chowdhury, Tina Hambuch, Kelin Ru, Gregory J. Baillie, Sean M. Grimmond, Ljubica Caldovic, Joseph M. Devaney, Miriam Bloom, Sarah Helen Evans, Jennifer L. Murphy, Nathan McNeill, Brent L. Fogel, Raphael Schiffmann, Marjo S. van der Knaap, Ryan J. Taft

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAustralian Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéZonMwEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentMyelin Project
KeywordsExome sequencingExomeWhite matterMedicineGeneticsBiologyMutationMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we report whole exome sequencing (WES) on a cohort of 71 patients with persistently unresolved white matter abnormalities with a suspected diagnosis of leukodystrophy or genetic leukoencephalopathy. WES analyses were performed on trio, or greater, family groups. Diagnostic pathogenic variants were identified in 35% (25 of 71) of patients. Potentially pathogenic variants were identified in clinically relevant genes in a further 7% (5 of 71) of cases, giving a total yield of clinical diagnoses in 42% of individuals. These findings provide evidence that WES can substantially decrease the number of unresolved white matter cases. Ann Neurol 2016;79:1031-1037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207