MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346227142 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.564

May 2016 at a Glance

2016· article· en· W2346227142 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Metra

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureEjection fractionInternal medicineCohortGuidelineCardiologyEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Important reviews regard the role of microRNAs, diagnosis and management of aortic stenosis in patients with heart failure (HF) and the use of composite endpoints in HF trials. Many research articles regard epidemiology. Thirty-year trends in HF hospitalizations, mortality and co-morbidities were analysed in a Danish nationwide cohort of 317 161 patients with first-time HF hospitalizations in the years 1983–2012. The annual rate of HF hospitalizations increased slightly up to 2000 and decreased markedly, 3.5% per year, thereafter. Similarly, between the years 1983–87 and 2008–12, the 1-year and the 1 to 5-year mortality rates declined from 45% to 33% and from 59% to 43%, respectively. The co-morbidity burden has increased over time with a larger role as a mortality cause.1 Conversely, no improvement in survival was found between 2003 and 2012 in 5908 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in the Swedish HF Registry. This was related to a high but stable use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and beta-blockers, variable use of mineralocorticoid antagonists and with a low absolute use of CRT and ICD, implanted in <10% of the patients in most of the hospitals. No implementation of evidence-based therapies occurred in this decade.2 Komajda et al. examined adherence to guideline-recommended drugs for HF in a large international, longitudinal survey of 7092 patients with HFrEF and a recent HF hospitalization. Adherence was good in 67% of the patients and moderate in other 25%. However, target doses and ≥50% target doses were administered in a very low proportion of patients.3 Van Hagen et al. have used the worldwide Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC), including 2742 pregnant women with cardiac disease, to validate the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) risk classification. Congenital heart disease was the most prevalent disease in advanced countries and valvular heart disease was more common in emerging countries. Cardiac events occurred in 12.8% of the patients in advanced countries vs. 36.3% in emerging countries, and the mWHO risk score performed better in advanced countries. Signs of HF and atrial fibrillation had an independent additive prognostic value.4 Abdominal obesity, measured as waist circumference and the waist-to-hip ratio, but not general obesity, assessed by the body mass index, was related to subclinical systolic dysfunction, measured by the global longitudinal strain, in 729 subjects from the population-based, prospective Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesions study.5 These data add to previous studies regarding the determinants of subclinical cardiac dysfunction6 and the role of obesity in HF.7 With respect to prognosis, an analysis of the Euro HF Survey-1 shows that the diagnostic coding position is associated with outcomes in patients with acute HF. In-hospital mortality was 16% in patients with a secondary diagnosis of HF vs. 7% in those with a primary diagnosis and 4% in those where the HF contribution was uncertain.8 A novel parameter of right ventricular function, measured as the product of TAPSE and the transtricuspid pressure gradient, had an independent prognostic value in patients with acute HF.9

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207