Special Issue Mobilizing Canada's Mental Health Strategy Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Until 2012, Canada was the only G7 country without a national mental health strategy.Changing Directions, Changing Lives (the Strategy) was developed by the Mental Health Commission of Canada (MHCC) (2012) over a 4-year period.The Strategy reflects extensive consultation with Canadians, including many who care passionately about the state of mental health services in our country.It grew out of the work of the Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology, which published the report Out of the Shadows At Last: Transforming Mental Health, Mental Illness and Addiction Services in Canada (Kirby & Keon, 2006) almost 10 years ago.Out of the Shadows called for major reforms to mental health care delivery, a mental health transition fund of $5.3 billion and a mental health commission to guide the reform.The creation of the MHCC and the release of the Strategy are key milestones in mental health policy in Canada, but Canada continues to have lower rates of spending on mental health than the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".