MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346466712

Protection of Nationals Abroad: The Mexican State and Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Canada

2012· article· en· W2346466712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karla B. Valenzuela

Bibliographic record

VenueMexican Law Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Labor and Employment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesMexican StateState (computer science)LawPoliticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Debido a las condiciones economicas en Mexico y a las necesidades de los agricultores canadienses, Mexico suscribio el Programa de Trabajadores Agricolas Temporales (PTAT) en 1974, convirtiendose en el mayor exportador de trabajadores agricolas a Canada. Durante su estancia en el extranjero, estos trabajadores tienen necesidades que deben ser atendidas por el gobierno mexicano, pero desafortunadamente este no ha podido proporcionar la proteccion adecuada a sus connacionales. El presente ensayo ofrece un panorama de los aspectos operacionales del programa, asi como las violaciones a este; identifica las necesidades de los trabajadores y los marcos juridicos internacionales y nacionales para la proteccion de los connacionales en el exterior. Esta investigacion representa una critica del papel que el gobierno mexicano desempena en la proteccion de los trabajadores agricolas temporales en Canada, identificando las limitaciones que enfrenta el Estado para dicha tarea

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMexican Law ReviewSame topicInternational Labor and Employment LawFrench-language works237,207