Genetic and phenotypic associations of type traits and body condition score with dry matter intake, milk yield, and number of breedings in first lactation Canadian Holstein cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to estimate genetic parameters of milk yield (MY), intake traits, type traits, body condition score (BCS), and number of breedings (NOB) in first lactation Canadian Holsteins with a focus on the possibility of using type traits as an indicator of feed intake. Data were obtained from the Canadian Dairy Network and Valacta. A mixed linear model was fitted under REML for the statistical analysis. The multivariate (five traits) model included the fixed effects of age at calving, stage of lactation, and herd-round-classifier for type traits; age at calving, stage of lactation, and herd–year–season of calving (HYS) for BCS; age at calving and HYS for MY, feed intake, and NOB. Animal and residual effects were fitted as random effects for all traits. Estimates of heritabilities for MY, dry matter intake (DMI), angularity, body depth, stature, dairy strength, final score, BCS, and NOB were 0.41, 0.13, 0.24, 0.30, 0.50, 0.30, 0.22, 0.20, and 0.02, respectively. Genetic correlations between type traits and DMI ranged from 0.16 to 0.60. Results indicate that type traits appear to have the potential to predict DMI as a combination/index of two or more traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".